What Would Jesus Do? Film: A Cinematic Exploration of Faith and Morality

The phrase “What Would Jesus Do?” has transcended its origins as a simple moral guideline to become a cultural touchstone, inspiring countless discussions, books, and even films. In the realm of cinema, the question takes on a unique dimension, blending spiritual inquiry with the visual and narrative power of film. This article delves into the various ways filmmakers have approached the question, exploring its implications for both believers and non-believers alike.

The Historical Context of “What Would Jesus Do?”

The phrase “What Would Jesus Do?” (WWJD) originated in the late 19th century, popularized by Charles Sheldon’s novel In His Steps. The book’s central premise—asking oneself what Jesus would do in any given situation—resonated deeply with readers, leading to its widespread adoption in Christian communities. Over time, the question became a shorthand for ethical decision-making, encouraging individuals to consider their actions through the lens of Christ’s teachings.

In the context of film, WWJD serves as a narrative device that can be both overt and subtle. Some films explicitly explore the question, while others use it as a thematic undercurrent, guiding characters’ choices and the overall moral arc of the story.

The Overt Exploration: Films That Ask the Question Directly

Several films have taken the WWJD question head-on, creating narratives that revolve around characters grappling with moral dilemmas and seeking guidance from Christ’s example. These films often serve as modern parables, using the medium of cinema to convey spiritual lessons.

One notable example is The Passion of the Christ (2004), directed by Mel Gibson. While the film primarily focuses on the final hours of Jesus’ life, it implicitly asks viewers to consider what Jesus would do in the face of immense suffering and betrayal. The film’s graphic depiction of Christ’s crucifixion serves as a stark reminder of the sacrifices he made, challenging audiences to reflect on their own lives and actions.

Another film that directly engages with the WWJD question is Jesus Camp (2006), a documentary that follows a group of children attending an evangelical summer camp. The film raises questions about the role of faith in shaping young minds, and whether the teachings of Jesus are being accurately represented. By focusing on the children’s experiences, the documentary invites viewers to consider how they would apply Christ’s teachings in their own lives, particularly in the context of parenting and education.

The Subtle Exploration: Films That Imply the Question

Not all films that engage with the WWJD question do so explicitly. Many films incorporate the question as a subtle theme, weaving it into the fabric of the story without directly referencing it. These films often explore broader ethical and moral issues, using the WWJD question as a guiding principle for character development and plot progression.

For instance, The Shawshank Redemption (1994) can be seen as a film that implicitly asks what Jesus would do in the face of injustice and suffering. The protagonist, Andy Dufresne, maintains his dignity and hope despite being wrongfully imprisoned, embodying qualities such as forgiveness, resilience, and compassion. While the film does not explicitly reference Jesus, Andy’s actions and the film’s overarching themes of redemption and hope align closely with Christ’s teachings.

Similarly, Les Misérables (2012) explores themes of mercy, justice, and redemption, all of which are central to the WWJD question. The character of Jean Valjean, who transforms from a hardened criminal to a compassionate benefactor, embodies the idea of living according to Christ’s example. His journey is a testament to the power of forgiveness and the possibility of redemption, even in the face of overwhelming adversity.

The Cultural Impact: WWJD in Popular Cinema

The WWJD question has also made its way into popular cinema, often in ways that are more lighthearted or satirical. Films like Bruce Almighty (2003) and Evan Almighty (2007) use humor to explore the idea of divine intervention and the challenges of living up to Christ’s example. While these films are primarily comedies, they still engage with the WWJD question, albeit in a more playful manner.

In Bruce Almighty, the protagonist, Bruce Nolan, is granted divine powers by God, leading him to grapple with the responsibilities and moral implications of his newfound abilities. The film ultimately suggests that true power lies not in controlling others, but in living a life of compassion and humility—values that are central to the WWJD question.

Evan Almighty, a spin-off of Bruce Almighty, takes a similar approach, with the protagonist, Evan Baxter, being tasked with building an ark in preparation for a great flood. The film uses humor to explore themes of faith, obedience, and the importance of following God’s will, even when it seems absurd or inconvenient.

The Ethical Dilemma: WWJD in Complex Narratives

Some films use the WWJD question to explore complex ethical dilemmas, presenting situations where the “right” answer is not immediately clear. These films challenge viewers to think critically about their own beliefs and values, and to consider how they would apply Christ’s teachings in difficult circumstances.

Doubt (2008), for example, presents a moral quandary involving a Catholic priest accused of inappropriate behavior with a student. The film does not provide clear answers, instead leaving viewers to grapple with questions of faith, doubt, and the nature of truth. The WWJD question is implicit throughout the film, as characters struggle to discern the right course of action in the face of uncertainty.

Similarly, Silence (2016), directed by Martin Scorsese, explores the challenges of maintaining faith in the face of persecution. The film follows two Jesuit priests who travel to Japan to spread Christianity, only to be captured and forced to renounce their faith. The WWJD question is central to the film, as the characters must decide whether to remain steadfast in their beliefs or to apostatize in order to save others. The film raises profound questions about the nature of faith, sacrifice, and the limits of human endurance.

Conclusion: The Enduring Relevance of WWJD in Film

The question “What Would Jesus Do?” continues to resonate in the world of cinema, offering filmmakers a rich source of inspiration for exploring complex moral and ethical issues. Whether overtly or subtly, the WWJD question challenges audiences to reflect on their own lives and actions, and to consider how they might live more closely in accordance with Christ’s teachings.

As cinema continues to evolve, the WWJD question will undoubtedly remain a powerful narrative device, inspiring filmmakers to create stories that provoke thought, inspire change, and encourage viewers to live lives of compassion, humility, and love.

Related Q&A

Q: How does the WWJD question influence character development in films?

A: The WWJD question often serves as a moral compass for characters, guiding their decisions and actions throughout the film. Characters who embody Christ-like qualities such as forgiveness, compassion, and self-sacrifice are often portrayed as heroes, while those who act in opposition to these values may be depicted as antagonists or flawed individuals in need of redemption.

Q: Can non-religious films also engage with the WWJD question?

A: Absolutely. While the WWJD question is rooted in Christian theology, its underlying principles—such as empathy, justice, and moral integrity—are universal. Non-religious films can and do explore these themes, often using the WWJD question as a subtle framework for character development and ethical dilemmas.

Q: How do filmmakers balance the WWJD question with the need for dramatic tension?

A: Filmmakers often use the WWJD question to create tension by placing characters in morally ambiguous situations where the “right” choice is not clear. This tension drives the narrative forward, as characters struggle to reconcile their actions with their beliefs, leading to moments of conflict, growth, and resolution.

Q: Are there any risks associated with using the WWJD question in film?

A: One potential risk is that the question can be perceived as overly simplistic or preachy, particularly if it is handled in a heavy-handed manner. To avoid this, filmmakers must approach the question with nuance and sensitivity, allowing characters to grapple with it in a way that feels authentic and relatable to audiences.